Menu

War Pygmalion - Black Sabbath's 'Master of Reality'

Wed 18th July 2012


Gareth

/incoming/bsmor.jpgWipe the freshly spat beverage of your choice from your computer screen and believe it; Apart from 'Vol 4' I have never heard a Sabbath album all the way through. I have nothing against them, but after getting into Zeppelin and Hendrix during a brief retro phase, I figured that was as good as classic hard rock was going to get. And while the first 4 Sabbath albums are thought highly of, the quality arguably tails off rapidly after that. Led Zeppelin didn't make an album that wasn't a start to finish classic until 'Presence', their 7th, and even this managed to kick off with 'Achilles Last Stand', a song which to this day makes me want to ride a galloping horse to work in full plate armour throwing burning torches through peoples windows on the way.

And as I can mentally picture you sat at your keybaords getting ready to flame me into oblivion if I bad mouth what's regarded as the original stoner album, let me spoil it for you nice and early on; I like it. A lot. Up yours.

I'm a fan of CD's and digital music for their capacity and convenience, but I occasinally feel that the extra space and ease of releasing music has invited a wave of laziness into modern music. In this respect, it's refreshing to go back to an album that's been designed to go onto vinyl. A curt 22 minutes per side discouraged unfocussed noodling (although no-one thought to inform Yes of this) and with bands forced to make sure each side was strong enough to stand alone, albums like 'Master of Reality' are a testament to the sense in this approach.

A mere 8 tracks long, (6 if you discount the 2 interlude tracks, 'Embryo' and 'Orchid' which total just under 2 minutes), even as stuffed full of riffs frequently copied in subsequent years as it is, the albums brevity and breathing spaces stop it becoming tiresome. Take note every stoner band since; Sabbath drew the blueprint for a genre in 34 and a half minutes. Your well meaning tribute that does nothing to advance said genre does not need to be an hour long.

And while 'Sweet Leaf' and 'Children of the Grave' are the albums best known tracks, it's 'Into the Void' that cements the albums reputation for me. A favourite since I picked up a 12" promo copy of Soundgardens 'Jesus Christ Pose' many (many) years ago with a cover of it on the b-side, it's as good an album closer as I could pick from what's on offer and an excellent barometer for the album as a whole. An oddity amongst the fuzz is penultimate track 'Solitude', a melancholic and shockingly relaxing tune which shows that, previously unbeknownst to me, Ozzy can actually carry a melody and Tony Iommi can play the flute. Who knew.

While the ominous riffs and original distortion soaked sound is there, Iommi's guitar tone initially seems to lack weight. I suspect this is due in equal parts to the limitations of 70's production and the light gauge strings he used being detuned to a then unheard of C# standard. And all the drugs. Oddly, this seems to improve over the albums 2nd half and the sound acquires some heft from somewhere. But even with the advances in modern equipment and recording technology since 1971, it's remarkable how many records since appear to be trying to ape the bands sound in terms of tone and feel. Fire up 'Sweet Leaf' and you could easily be hearing the guitars of Fu Manchu or any number of modern bands, and the ever changing rota of Kyuss bassists have clearly had Geezer Butler's tone at the front of their mind when dialling in their sounds. The bands legacy truly cannot be understated and it's impressive that after 41 years, I'd rather listen to the originals than most of the imitators they inspired. Colour me very pleasantly suprised, I appear to be a Black Sabbath fan.

Discuss

Log in or sign up to post.

    •  PetePete
    • Add your comments here!
    •  mambamamba
    • I enjoyed that read.
    •  PetePete
    • I remember hearing it for the first time, when in my teens. I felt like I'd heard it many times before. It took me a while to realise it was because so many people have copied it's blueprint in varying forms of metal. This isn't uncommon in genre-beginning albums like this, but this album like no other has been aped so blatantly and unashamedly - the Children of the Grave riff especially has been used over and over again. Not that I mind.

    •  bosskeloidbosskeloid
    • Brilliant and glad as this is a beast of an album..

      my favorite line in this piece: 'Take note every stoner band since; Sabbath drew the blueprint for a genre in 34 and a half minutes. Your well meaning tribute that does nothing to advance said genre does not need to be an hour long'

      I agree 100%!!!
    •  Big SiBig Si
    • Is it wrong that I don't think it's as much fun when Gareth likes the album and nobody gets angry? I've clearly spent too much time on the Guardian comments section lately.

      I've also only just discovered I can get on here at work. Stand by.
    •  LaddethLaddeth
    • Into the Void just reminds me of Throne.
      Das ist win.
    •  mikemike
    • Such a good album, been enjoying the BBC4 Sabbath stuff, God Bless Ozzy Osbourne bought a tear to my eye seeing Randy Rhoades talking about his playing just before he died, seems like him and Ozzy were best mates.

      I'd extend the 'first four' debate to include SBS and Sabotage! too, some absolute beasts on those albums too. Everything after I tend to ignore.
    •  Big SiBig Si
    • I agree - it should be a first six. I can't see any great difference in quality between Volume IV and SBS or Sabbotage. Although I do think there's a certain stylistic difference that comes in after MoR, the later albums lack the rawness of the first three.
      So either first 3 or first 6, 4 seems a bit arbitrary.
    •  LimbBobLimbBob
    • Meh. Not as good as Dehumanizer.

      I know we all agree.

      Actually I said that and realised I still quite like Dehumanizer (Though no where near as much), You can't joke about Sabbath.
    •  GarethGareth
    • Big Si says:
      So either first 3 or first 6, 4 seems a bit arbitrary.


      I think it's because over the years, everyone seemed to talk about the first 4 so I assumed (possibly wrongly) whatever followed wasn't up to the same standard, whereas most Zeppelin fans will recommend anything up to 'Physical Graffiti'. I do admit few would name 'Houses of the Holy'.

      If you asked someone to recommend a Sabbath album I doubt they'd name anything after 'Vol 4'. I think this is the one Ben recommended in the pub but I was quite drunk and spilled a half pint of beer on his crotch shortly after the conversation.

      Thankfully Spotify seems to have most of the early stuff so I can fill in some gaps.
    •  mikemike
    • Symptom of the Universe is my fave Sabbath song and thats on a later one. You get some weird stuff which actually works on the later ones too, see 'A National Acrobat' and 'Spiral Architect' oh and 'Hole in the Sky' which is about as apocolyptic a song as 'Black Sabbath' I reckon.
    •  Big SiBig Si
    • I'm going to be needlessly controversial and say I don't really like Vol 4 that much.
    •  HopkinsHopkins
    • Big Si says:
      I'm going to be needlessly controversial and say I don't really like Vol 4 that much.


      'changes' is a big massive turd

      i don't own, or have ever listened to, any black sabbath album released after sabotage
    •  basstardbasstard
    • Love the first 6 and cherry pick bits from subsequent albums.
      I seem to change my fave Sabbath album on a regular basis- at the moment its Sabbath Bloody Sabbath, mostly due to the title track and its orgasmic key change, one of my all-time top musical moments.
    •  sabbathfansabbathfan
    • Gareth says:
      Big Si says:
      So either first 3 or first 6, 4 seems a bit arbitrary.


      I think it's because over the years, everyone seemed to talk about the first 4 so I assumed (possibly wrongly) whatever followed wasn't up to the same standard, whereas most Zeppelin fans will recommend anything up to 'Physical Graffiti'. I do admit few would name 'Houses of the Holy'.

      If you asked someone to recommend a Sabbath album I doubt they'd name anything after 'Vol 4'. I think this is the one Ben recommended in the pub but I was quite drunk and spilled a half pint of beer on his crotch shortly after the conversation.

      Thankfully Spotify seems to have most of the early stuff so I can fill in some gaps.


      The first 6 Sabbath albums are classics, and I can't recommend Sabotage enough - it's a very gloomy album, and there's a very raw edge to it. They made it while completely strung out on coke after finding out their management had ripped them off royally for years, so there's an absolute wild anger to it that is pretty frightening.

      My favourite Sabbath album changes around; having said that I've always thought the debut's historical importance outweighed the actual music within somewhat - it's good but there's a noticeable step up to the next record.
    •  GarethGareth
    • Big Si says:
      I'm going to be needlessly controversial and say I don't really like Vol 4 that much.


      I bought Vol 4 a couple of years ago and wasn't impressed. As it was my first Sabbath album it left the impression I hadn't been missing out. Turns out I should have selected more carefully.
    •  MazzMazz
    • "Led Zeppelin didn't make an album that wasn't a start to finish classic until 'Presence', their 7th"

      HEY PAL..WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT..PRESENCE FUCKING ROCKS...24/7
    •  HopkinsHopkins
    • houses of the holy had 2 absolute stinkers on it, in the shape of d'yer mak'er and the clunge
    •  GarethGareth
    • Hopkins says:
      d'yer mak'er


      I refuse to acknowledge that songs existence.
    •  MazzMazz
    • Gareth says:
      Hopkins says:
      d'yer mak'er


      I refuse to acknowledge that songs existence.


      It's their strongest work.